The present evaluation generally adopts two kinds of evaluation methods: evaluation method of comprehensive evaluation method and the lowest bid.
It introduces the comprehensive evaluation method of our Jiangsu province by:
The comprehensive evaluation method is in accordance with the different scores of weight of bidding documents set respectively on the technical standards and business standard score according to the scoring or bid price level recommended successful candidate.
The comprehensive evaluation method, the evaluation factors and standards:
(a) bid (70 minute)
In the following four methods, the tenderee can choose a method as the bidding evaluation standard; also can choose four methods and in opening randomly determined a method as the bidding evaluation standard:
Method: to effective bidding document evaluation arithmetic average value for a (if effective bidding documents is more than or equal to 7 home, get rid of one of a high and a low after take the arithmetic average value for a; if effective bidding documents is more than or equal to 10 home, get rid of one of the two high and two low after take the arithmetic average as a).
The evaluation benchmark price of =A * K, K representatives elected by the random value extraction before the opening to determine the range of K value for 95%-98%. The bid price is equal to the benchmark price evaluation score; the corresponding button deviates from the benchmark price reduction score evaluation.
Method 2: to effective bidding document evaluation arithmetic average value for a (if more than 7 effective bidding documents is less than or equal to 10, which removed a high and a low after take the arithmetic average value for a; if effective bidding documents is more than or equal to 10 home, get rid of one of the two high and two low after take the arithmetic average is a), the highest bid price for B,:
The evaluation benchmark price of =A * K1 * Q1+B * K2 * Q2
Q2=1-Q1, Q1, Q2 value shall generally be equal or greater than 30 percent; K1 values range from 95% to 98%; range of K2, the construction is 90% ~ 100%, decoration, installation of 88% ~ 100%, municipal engineering is 86% - 100%, garden greening engineering was 84% ~ 100%, and other engineering 88% ~ 100%. Q1, K1 representatives elected by the random value extraction before the opening of the determined. K2 by the tenderer in the tender documents clearly. The bid price is equal to the benchmark price evaluation score; the corresponding button deviates from the benchmark price reduction score evaluation.
Method three: to effectively bid low evaluation price for the evaluation of the benchmark price, the bid price is equal to the benchmark price evaluation score; deviation evaluation base price, deduct the score.
Methods: four in the lowest bid price of the bidding documents valid for the evaluation of the benchmark price, the bid price is equal to the benchmark price evaluation score; deviation evaluation base price, deduct the score.
(two) the construction organization design (less than 20)
The tenderer may in the following two ways to choose as a standard assessment of construction organization design:
Method: the construction organization design only qualification review, not to score.
Method two: the evaluation committee according to the review points to determine the bid documents, the construction organization design of bid documents score.
(three) the performance (less than 1)
Can enterprises to tender or project person in charge to assume a similar and above engineering points, the tenderee shall be in the tender documents in clear tender enterprise or project responsible person to assume a single similar and above and works in a score, as well as the effective period (generally not more than 5
Year, (usually) points based on the bid notices, construction contract and final acceptance certificate).
The term "meaning and attachment of similar projects the same. The tenderer shall, according to the specific circumstances of the project, the selection and determination of some indicators, in the bidding documents for similar projects to be clearly defined.
(four) the market credit evaluation or awards (not at the same time taking into account)
1 market credit evaluation (3-5)
The tender may be dynamic construction enterprises market credit evaluation scores as evaluation factors, according to a certain proportion into the scoring system.
2 Awards (less than 2)
Responsible for project bidding of the project won the provincial and municipal, provincial, National City (referring to Luban award, the national construction quality awards committee review of the "national high quality project", China Institute of civil engineering and civil engineering Zhan Tianyou science and Technology Development Foundation jointly review "China Zhan Tianyou Civil Engineering Award, China Building Decoration Association review of the" National Construction Engineering Decoration Award "," Chinese Installation Association review Chinese installation star, Chinese Construction Metal Structure Association review "China steel structure gold", Chinese Municipal Engineering Association review "national demonstration project of municipal gold cup award") to give extra points, which is the highest and 0.3 provincial level that is valid for a period of 1 years; the highest quality 1 points, valid for 2 years; the Luban prize, "national high quality project", "civil Chinese Engineering Zhantianyou awards "plus a maximum of 1.5 points, valid for 3 years;" National Construction Engineering Decoration Award "," China Star "," China steel structure gold prize "," national demonstration project of municipal gold cup "plus a maximum of 1.2 points and is valid for 3 years. Only when the points for a score in the top prize award.
Project for bidding project responsible for provincial administrative departments in charge of the city and above building assessment "civilization site" award of the given points, including: provincial municipal supreme plus 0.1 points, the provincial supreme plus 0.3 points, valid for 2 years. Only 1 points for the highest award award in the score.
The award is not the bidder undertakes the project, not to score. Other awards will not score.
(five) bidding rationality (less than 2)
The evaluation factors is set up